Sunday, July 11, 2010
NEGROS PLEASE, WHERE DID YAWL BUY THOSE MONKEY SUITS, WHOA: A polictical discussion
Some negros love to drink a little wine and talk on the tele-negro-phone. Monkey see, monkey do the doo-doo.
Listen, I never could understand why some negros believe it's necessary to engage in negative criticism concerning our president. Seriously, although many cloak their misguided remarks and/or hide behind their words by saying "it's just our opinion and it's "constructive criticism", I beg to differ, and say, "every closed eye ain't sleep"
Now, the following is one of the sentiments I heard... "We have blinded ourselves with slavish devotion to Obama. The rhetoric for change, 1st black president, all that stuff is a smokescreen"
Seriously?! Who they hell is "WE"... and "Slavish devotion?!"... give me a freaking break.
Listen, it's statements like that, that draw my evilest eye. It's terribly presumptuous of some folks and very snooty to assume those of us who support Obama's mission and feel no need, nor purpose, to highlight all his "alleged" missteps, are some kind of closed mouthed groupies, and so called Hero Worshippers. Those that believe so, are obviously blinded by his own arrogance and self importance, and a need to stroke their own ego.
But my wayward negros continued their defence of why they have a need to beat down President Obama.
"Folks like Tavis, Dyson, West, Farakhan are trying to point out these problems".... "we have a "Wall Street government". "folks like us with no power or money squabble over while the folks with real control "stack mad paper".
Excuse me?! Tavis "suck butt" smiley, Dyson and West? Okay, I'm not going there but check this. First, what fool squabble over the white man's money, and who can honestly believe all the race centered scorn and ridicule, directed at President Obama is justified and/or necessary? Really, what part of the solutions calls for calling him a mulatto, or any of the other disrespectful names used to assassinate his character? More importantly, how productive is it to call those that do not wish to engage in that form of vile conversation.... hero worshippers, or any of the other names that's been used to imply we are simply following a man with a God like hold on our brains.?
Again, "Slavish devotees"?! Please, somebody gotta splain that one to this ol' school fool.
Look, in short, pointing out problems is great, but the ways and mean of doing such (re: Obama), frequently has missed the mark. It cannot be denied that many issues are out of Obama's control, yet, many use any nondescript problem (out of Obama's control) as vehicles to vilify him. It goes without saying that most of the foolish banter is far removed from "constructive criticism". Frequently it's nothing more than negros talking shit and moving their own selfish agendas. And I've said this many times... I am all for constructive feedback, but if the feedback is nothing but gripes and moans, sticks and stones, porous opinions and bitches with switches , I don't view that as constructive feedback. That's more akin to the negro-lites real message of "replace Obama".
Any benefit that we accrue as a result of an Obama (any man's presidency) is purely incidental. I would liken it to the benefit folks today enjoy as a result of America's actions including that institution called slavery.
Now it's time we all say AMEN!
Here's what I am suggesting. First, it's unreasonable to believe that all the conversations and scorn directed at President Obama is justified and comes from individuals that have all POC and President Obama in their best interest. And, much of the "discourse" is spoken from those that have ulterior motives behind their opinions. That's true and cannot be denied, listen to this.
I heard a bunch of negros being played like black pawns hanging from the end of puppet strings. So I wondered where they got their monkey suits and where they got their news? From what I was hearing, I believe they received their misguided opinions from another negro. And they didn't look very deep. But they all joined hands.
Yelp, another case of monkey see, monkey see doo-doo. If all they heard be true (WHICH WAS NOT THE CASE) my question was, why were they playing in that mess?
Try this at home. When you find yourself in a conversation with another person, start talking negatively about someone or something, and then notice what the other person does. You guessed it, 90% OF THE TIME THEY WILL FOLLOW SUIT, because people usually give BACK what they receive. It's simple human behavior (unfortunately) to be part of "a common opinion", if only for that moment in time. It's easier to be "agreeable".
Really, try this at home. Give someone a smile, and in most cases, I bet you get one back. Even a stranger will return a smile. On the flip-side, mean-mug someone and I bet you do not receive a smile. That's just simple human behavior.
I am suggesting that one dirty face takes away 10 "atta-boys". And again, there are more followers than there are leaders. More importantly, the risk is always a given - negative attracts negative. No value, no reward.
Skepticism and mistrust should led a person to always look up the information or theories people present. It's basically the development of the scientific mindset... And, "A good scientist is observant and notices thing in the world around him/herself. (S)he sees, hears, or in some other way notices what’s going on in the world and becomes curious about what’s happening".
By doing a deep investigation of the motives and opinions of others, a person can actually come to a qualified conclusion.
The problem is MOST people will watch one documentary, listen to a few "championed" negros, believe everything, and stop there. They might take action, but when they actually try to explain to someone else why they are taking action, they realize they don't even know why they are taking action. They give up because they still only have the band-aid of knowledge. That's the problem! They got their new "news" from a source, instead of exploring all there is on the topic from all sides. If they do that, then they come to their OWN conclusions based on all the information they've seen and can actually BELIEVE in it and defend their beliefs.
So, I've been reading some of the limber mouth rhetoric of some of our black naysay negro brothers and sisters. They've been ranting that Obama did this and that, much of which had nothing to do with his power to control the situation and had nothing to do with his skin color. Now mind you, little or nothing of what they are saying is rooted in any facts, but nevertheless, they are quick to point a glaring stare at Mr Obama. I am asking those misguided bobbin head Uncle Toms and Tomettes to tell me where they are getting their information and how much of it do they believe to be true. Because if it's not fact based and not voiced to persuade other to dance on Obama's head, then they need to check themselves.
If this shoe does not fit don't wear it. But negroes please, if this shoe does fit, why don't you sit down a while before you speak. Don't be so prone to jump on a bandwagon before you know where it's going, and why it's going in that direction. Get your own map, and map your own direction. Then you'll be standing on facts instead of porous opinions, or some sh*t you heard from Tavis Smiley, or on CNN or Fox news.
Lastly, the beat goes on and the question remains... if not Obama than who? Bring ME his or her name! My wayward squawk talkers have refused to answer that question and I know why.